The influence of the confirmation of transactions on the commercial speed of cryptocurrency
Cryptocurrency has revolutionized our way of thinking of transactions and trade. With its rapid, decentralized and safe nature, it is not surprising that many investors have used digital currencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum and others to buy, sell and act other assets.
However, one of the most important aspects of cryptocurrency trade is the confirmation of transactions. This process is of crucial importance to create confidence between the parties, but it can also affect commercial speed in different ways. In this article, we will deal with the effects of confirmation of transactions on the commercial speed of cryptocurrency and will examine the effects on market efficiency and liquidity.
What is the confirmation of transactions?
The transaction confirmation refers to the process by which a buyer sends a cryptocurrency to the wallet of a seller after agreeing to buy it at a certain price. This confirmation is generally carried out via a third -party supplier, known as blockchain network, e.g. B. The Lightning network of Bitcoin or Etherum’s Ether Gateway Ethereum.
The influence of confirmation of transactions on commercial speed
There are several reasons why confirmation of the transaction can influence commercial speed:
- The increased latency : Confirmation of transactions can introduce delays in the settlement process, which can cause increased latency and slower trading speeds.
- higher costs : a high level of transaction confirmation can lead to higher costs for buyers and sellers, which reduces total beneficiary margins.
- Reduction of liquidity : Inadequate or delayed transaction confirmation can limit market participation, reduce the availability of liquidity and increase time for the payment of activities.
The case against confirmation of high transactions
While some maintain that a high transaction confirmation is necessary to guarantee security and confidence in the cryptocurrency markets, this approach has several drawbacks:
- Reduction of commercial speed : higher transaction confirmation levels can cause increased latency, which has a negative impact on commercial speeds.
- Increased cost : The inadequate or delayed confirmation of transactions can lead to higher costs, which reduces the profitability of companies.
- Reduction of market efficiency : Excessive confirmation of transactions can make new investors and dealers who are difficult to enter the markets, which leads to a drop in all market liquidity.
The case against a very low transaction confirmation
On the other hand, some maintain that very low transaction confirmation levels can improve commercial speeds by allowing faster regulations:
- Latence reduction : faster transaction confirmation times can lead to faster exchange and increased commercial speed.
- Lower costs : The lower transactions confirmation requirements can cause drop fees for buyers and sellers, which makes cryptocurrency markets more accessible to a wider range of participants.
- The increased efficiency of the market : reduced latency and a drop in costs can improve market efficiency by encouraging market players to take more risks.
The best approach?
Although there is no uniform solution, the best approach seems to be a balance between the requirements of transaction confirmations and commercial speed:
- Use standardized transaction confirmation times : Definition of standardized transaction confirmation times can help have all parties having enough time to make transactions without excessive delay.
- Implementation of expensive solutions : Offer of profitable solutions for transaction confirmation, e.g. B. Lot or the use of several blockchain networks, can help reduce costs and improve commercial speeds.
3 and 3